EXP-030VALIDATED
Advantage Decomposition / SHA-256

Consumption of the reset path by Σ0(a5)

If the connected reset path retains a useful simplification, it should appear in the exact a5[22] mask or in the four low lanes of Σ0(a5) for the actual survivors.

Claim statusNO END-TO-END MINING ADVANTAGE DEMONSTRATED

Diagnostic work, exact algebra and local capabilities are not treated as end-to-end mining advantage.

Date2026-08-14
HardwareClassical exact algebraic verifier
Run scopeThree canonical variants
ReproducibilityReconstruct exact truth masks, apply a Möbius transform to obtain ANF coefficients, preserve the registered survivor split and repeat all contrasts on the untouched fresh cohort.
01 / Question & hypothesis

What was tested?

If the connected reset path retains a useful simplification, it should appear in the exact a5[22] mask or in the four low lanes of Σ0(a5) for the actual survivors.

02 / Scientific basis

Why the test is meaningful

Rotations redistribute state-bit dependencies rather than erase them. Algebraic normal form (ANF) gives a unique representation over GF(2), allowing complexity to be compared by nonlinear monomial support while exact mask semantics remain the primary gate.

Σ0(a5)=ROTR²(a5)⊕ROTR¹³(a5)⊕ROTR²²(a5)f(x)=⊕_{S⊆{0,1,2,3}} α_S ∏_{i∈S}x_inonlinear support N(f)={S:α_S=1, |S|≥2}
Consumption of the reset path by Σ0(a5)Visual reading of the published metrics and gates for EXP-030; it summarizes the registered result, not a mining advantage.EXP-030 / CONSUMPTION OF THE RESET PATH BY Σ0(A5)FRESH RECORDS300SEMANTIC ERRORS0STABLE SIMPLIFICATIONNO
FIGURE / RESULT READINGVisual reading of the published metrics and gates for EXP-030; it summarizes the registered result, not a mining advantage.
03 / Method

How it was tested

Compose the V29 carry masks into exact a5 bit 22 and Σ0(a5).low4 truth masks. Compare nonlinear support between connected survivors and non-survivors in the 1,361-record original cohort, then repeat on 300 fresh records without converting group contrasts into selectors.

04 / Observed result

What happened

Fresh records300
Semantic errors0
Stable simplificationNO

Semantic errors were zero. Original mean Σ0 low4 nonlinear support was 9.951 for non-survivors and 9.910 for survivors; fresh means were 10.063 and 10.099, reversing the small difference. At lane 0, every fresh mask was unique within its group.

05 / Validation

Exactness and statistical controls

Every ANF was derived from an exact truth mask. The decisive comparison was replication of direction: the small original low4 simplification did not replicate in the fresh cohort. Therefore no survivor simplification was promoted.

06 / Interpretation

What the result means

By the first connected Σ0 consumer, the reset-derived signal is attenuated to small, unstable group contrasts. V30 is a scientifically useful non-promotion result, not a failed exact computation.

Limitations

  • ANF monomial count is a representation metric, not native circuit cost.
  • Survivor groups are fixed observed groups, not predictive selectors.
  • Small differences require independent replication and uncertainty-aware interpretation.
07 / Reproduction

Evidence trail

Reconstruct exact truth masks, apply a Möbius transform to obtain ANF coefficients, preserve the registered survivor split and repeat all contrasts on the untouched fresh cohort.

Canonical variants

SUBENGINE-V30ASUBENGINE-V30BSUBENGINE-V30C

Source: internally audited canonical reports. Local filesystem structure, private headers and operational identifiers are excluded from publication.