EXP-041VALIDATED
Advantage Decomposition / SHA-256

Effective bit-17 restart to carry 22

A hard reset at bit 17 remains operationally effective only when no later bit-18 reset overwrites it; under that condition it should reconstruct carry 22 exactly.

Claim statusNO END-TO-END MINING ADVANTAGE DEMONSTRATED

Diagnostic work, exact algebra and local capabilities are not treated as end-to-end mining advantage.

Date2026-08-23
HardwareClassical exact algebraic verifier
Run scopeThree canonical variants
ReproducibilityRebuild reset17/reset18 masks, select the latest reset, ripple the exact suffix to carry 22 and require zero lane errors in original and untouched fresh cohorts.
01 / Question & hypothesis

What was tested?

A hard reset at bit 17 remains operationally effective only when no later bit-18 reset overwrites it; under that condition it should reconstruct carry 22 exactly.

02 / Scientific basis

Why the test is meaningful

In ripple addition, the latest reset dominates all earlier carry history. Calling every bit-17 reset useful would double-count records later reset at bit 18. The correct estimand is therefore the effective subset: reset17 ∧ ¬reset18.

E17 = R17 ∧ ¬R18c18 = value(R17) on E17c22 = G_{18:21} ∨ (P_{18:21} ∧ c18)
Effective restart selectionOnly a bit-17 reset not superseded at bit 18 is propagated to carry 22.EXP-041 / EFFECTIVE RESTART SELECTIONRESET 17233 / 1,361NO RESET 18effective subsetCARRY 220 errors
FIGURE / RESULT READINGOnly a bit-17 reset not superseded at bit 18 is propagated to carry 22.
03 / Method

How it was tested

Join the exact reset atlas to the connected suffix masks, retain only records whose latest reset is bit 17, reconstruct carry 22 lane by lane and repeat the frozen procedure on an independent 300-record cohort.

04 / Observed result

What happened

Original effective rate17.12%
Fresh effective rate21.33%
Semantic errors0

The original cohort contained 233 effective bit-17 resets among 1,361 records (17.12%); the fresh cohort contained 64 among 300 (21.33%). Carry-22 reconstruction had zero semantic errors. Fresh reset values split 28 zeros and 36 ones, while mean nonlinear support at carry 22 was 2.484 monomials.

05 / Validation

Exactness and statistical controls

Exact lane equality, not correlation, was the primary gate. Original and fresh cohorts were reported separately, and bit-18 dominance was applied before any rate calculation. No independent probabilities were multiplied.

06 / Interpretation

What the result means

V41 validates a narrower, causally correct restart capability. The bit-17 reset survives to the requested boundary only in the effective subset; its downstream Boolean complexity remains nonzero.

Limitations

  • The effective fraction is distribution-dependent.
  • ANF support is not native execution cost.
  • No prospective selector or ASIC saving was measured.
07 / Reproduction

Evidence trail

Rebuild reset17/reset18 masks, select the latest reset, ripple the exact suffix to carry 22 and require zero lane errors in original and untouched fresh cohorts.

Canonical variants

SUBENGINE-V41ASUBENGINE-V41BSUBENGINE-V41C

Source: internally audited canonical reports. Local filesystem structure, private headers and operational identifiers are excluded from publication.