EXP-034VALIDATED
Advantage Decomposition / SHA-256

Carry regeneration after cancellation

Any suppression attributed to x3 may be erased when modular addition regenerates nonlinear terms through carry, so the next connected carry frontier must be profiled exactly.

Claim statusNO END-TO-END MINING ADVANTAGE DEMONSTRATED

Diagnostic work, exact algebra and local capabilities are not treated as end-to-end mining advantage.

Date2026-08-14
HardwareClassical exact algebraic verifier
Run scopeThree canonical variants
ReproducibilityStart from exact component masks, execute the full ripple recurrence lane by lane, tag regenerated monomials and compare the result against direct modular addition on both cohorts.
01 / Question & hypothesis

What was tested?

Any suppression attributed to x3 may be erased when modular addition regenerates nonlinear terms through carry, so the next connected carry frontier must be profiled exactly.

02 / Scientific basis

Why the test is meaningful

XOR can cancel ANF terms, but integer addition introduces products through its carry recurrence. Thus a simpler operand bit does not guarantee a simpler sum bit. Carry regeneration is the mechanism that must be tested before propagating a local Boolean claim.

s_i=u_i⊕v_i⊕c_ic_{i+1}=(u_i∧v_i)∨(c_i∧(u_i⊕v_i))regenerated term = absent before carry composition, present after exact addition
Carry regeneration after cancellationVisual reading of the published metrics and gates for EXP-034; it summarizes the registered result, not a mining advantage.EXP-034 / CARRY REGENERATION AFTER CANCELLATIONORIGINAL RECORDS1,361FRESH RECORDS300SEMANTIC ERRORS0
FIGURE / RESULT READINGVisual reading of the published metrics and gates for EXP-034; it summarizes the registered result, not a mining advantage.
03 / Method

How it was tested

Follow the x3-attributed components into the connected modular addition, construct exact carry-regeneration truth tables and compare nonlinear support for actual survivor/non-survivor groups in original and fresh cohorts.

04 / Observed result

What happened

Original records1,361
Fresh records300
Semantic errors0

The connected carry profiles were reconstructed with zero semantic errors over 1,361 original and 300 fresh records. Carry regenerated part of the locally suppressed structure; the synthesis did not authorize a simplified end-to-end branch.

05 / Validation

Exactness and statistical controls

Every post-carry mask was matched to direct addition. The same predefined summaries were produced for 545/816 original and 111/189 fresh survivor splits. No favorable aggregate was converted into a selector.

06 / Interpretation

What the result means

The experiment confirms why local XOR simplification is fragile: nonlinear complexity can re-enter through carry immediately. This is a boundary result that prevents overclaiming from V31–V33.

Limitations

  • The profile is tied to one connected frontier and source cube.
  • Nonlinear support remains a representational proxy.
  • No measured computational advantage survived the carry stage.
07 / Reproduction

Evidence trail

Start from exact component masks, execute the full ripple recurrence lane by lane, tag regenerated monomials and compare the result against direct modular addition on both cohorts.

Canonical variants

SUBENGINE-V34ASUBENGINE-V34BSUBENGINE-V34C

Source: internally audited canonical reports. Local filesystem structure, private headers and operational identifiers are excluded from publication.